Showing your supportIf the gay marriage debate is something you feel strongly about, or you would like to have some options of support shown to you, please read this and contact the appropriate members. In a recent press conference, the PM has stated he will overturn the ACT Civil union bill. WE NEED YOUR HELP!! The ACT Chief Minister has been receiving large amounts of emails and currently has only about 20% supporting the ACT Govt and 80% against and we know how organised our opposition is. Remember the famous 13,000 to 100 on the s-s marriage amendment! We need to put our voice behind the ACT people and the ACT Government! Please let the federal politician's know that those who support their discimnatory actions are in fact in the minority and that most fair-minded Australia's do support recognising same-sex relationships and removing discrimination. Please personalise the message if you can it gives it more weight with politicians than a template letter. If you are feeling despondent read some of the great media coverage Email addresses Politicians to Send the letters to are at the bottom of this email - apologies if we have missed off any key Vic people = please pass it on to them EXAMPLE LETTER: Dear Sir/Madam, The Australian federal government, through public statements made by the Prime Minister, John Howard MP, and the Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock MP, has previously gone on the record to state that it would not interfere with a State or Territory's decision to enact civil union legislation. And yet today I read that it is threatening to overturn the Australian Capital Territory (ACT's) Civil Unions Bill The Civil Unions Bill (ACT) 2006 specifically states that a civil union is NOT a marriage. The Civil Unions Bill (ACT) 2006 was drafted with the intention of giving equal rights and recognition to all committed and consensual relationships in the ACT in terms of ACT law. Can you please explain why you have a problem with this? It is surely clear to the Federal Government that the Civil Unions Bill (ACT) 2006 only has the power/ability to end discrimination against same sex couples in terms of ACT law and in the ACT jurisdiction. It does not effect Commonwealth law nor does it purport to extend beyond the ACT's jurisdiction. An ACT civil union is not a 'marriage' therefore it does not conflict with federal law, ie the Marriage Act, under the powers delegated to federal government in the Constitution. Any steps that the Federal Government takes to By claiming that the Civil Union Bill is 'marriage by another name' the Federal Government is conveniently glossing over the discrimination that couples undertaking a civil union in the ACT would still suffer under federal law. As long as the Federal
I sincerely hope you reconsider your threat against the ACT bill on civil unions. NAME ACT Govt
Kim.Beazley.MP@aph.gov.au
|
|
|
|
|
|