Music Login to Profiles Book Club
Home | News | Australia | Victorian Relationships Bill Passed

Victorian Relationships Bill Passed

Published Mar 13, 2008
GenQNews

Victorian Gay and de facto couples will now be able to register their relationships, due to historic legislation being passed last night in the state’s lower house. The Government’s Relationships Bill will be introduced to the upper house today and could become law as early as next month.

The Relationships Bill will allow couples to record their relationships with the Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriage and is set to make it easier for unmarried people to access existing entitlements such as superannuation, by allowing them a simpler way to prove they are in a relationship. 

Under existing laws, couples may be required to provide evidence to prove their relationship, for example, in medical emergencies or to access property and life insurance entitlements.

In a vote that split the opposition, Liberal leader Ted Baillieu supported the Government bill, saying he had a strong view about bringing people together, and an optimistic view of this legislation and that this bill was about respect.

"I recognise, acknowledge and respect that there are many with a counter view, many who are concerned that this bill signals an erosion of traditional marriage," he told Parliament.

However, Mr Baillieu’s new Coalition partner, Nationals leader Peter Ryan, opposed it (as did several Liberal frontbenchers) saying it would detract from the importance of marriage.

"What this bill does is to establish a structure which is a step toward equalising the notion of a same sex relationship, in particular, with that of marriage," he said.

All Labor MPs in the chamber for the 10pm voted in support of the bill, with 54 MPs in total in support and only 24 MPs against. Attorney-General Rob Hulls described passage of the legislation as "a great day for Victoria".

Introducing the bill last December, Attorney-General Rob Hulls said it would overcome discrimination and promote human rights.

"What this bill does is to enable couples who want the dignity of formal recognition of their loving relationship to register it, to receive a certificate, and to have the security of knowing that their decision to commit to a shared life with each other is respected in Victoria," Mr Hulls stated at parliament on December 6.

The Government has said that the new legislature does not create gay marriages or civil unions but will improve access to entitlements such as superannuation for gay couples.

The bill will be passed in the upper house, with Labor, the Greens and several Liberals certain to support it.

Tags: relationships register





Get GenQ home delivered every weekend. Best things to do,competitions and more! Here



Casino Royale by admin on 16-11-2008

Wild Summer 2009 2cd & DVD by admin on 14-11-2008

Kings Of Leon To Return To Australia & New Zealand In ‘09 by admin on 14-11-2008

The Veronicas Second Melbourne & Third Sydney Shows Added to Meet Demand! by admin on 13-11-2008

GenQ talks to Kiwi Singer/Songwriter Anika Moa by admin on 13-11-2008



Comments

1 comment(s) on this page. Add your own comment below.

Zeke
Mar 14, 2008 2:28am [ 1 ]

"...Attorney-General Rob Hulls said it would overcome discrimination..."

Huh? That's a bit of an over-reach wouldn't you say Mr. Hulls?

I'm not exactly sure how giving gay couples a third class status with 1/20th the rights, benefits and responsibilities of straight married couples qualifies as having "overcome" discrimination. Not "overcoming discrimination" or "a first step toward overcoming discrimination" mind you but OVERCOME, as in definitive, a done deal.

I'm affraid this is the kind of talk and propaganda that encourages gays and lesbians to mistake second class rights and status for equality.

Look at Britain. The gay and lesbian community there are convinced that they have equality even though the government and the church makes it plainly clear that what they have is NOT marriage but rather a legal flatmate status. Think about it "Civil Partnership". The name says it all. They even avoided using the term "Union" because it was too close to giving the impression that the relationship was anything more than a business arrangement. "Union" gives the impression that it is a bonding of love, a bonding of lives and a bonding of souls. Oh no, that would NEVER do so they settled on "Partnership" to make it clear that they were only recognizing the business relationship between people who live together (flatmates).

There is NO equality in these laws until straight people have access to legal NON-marriage unions and gay people have access to marriage.

Add a Comment

Please be civil.

( Use Markdown for formatting.)

( )